SHRI.V.KARUPPAIAH K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI vs THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS — MAT /40/2026
Case under Andaman and Nicobar Islands Value Added Tax Regulation, 2017 Section NA. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0002682026
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
MAT /40/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
MAT /40/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
SALES TAX ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI.V.KARUPPAIAH K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI
Respondent(s)
THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (VAT)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 19-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary: The High Court at Calcutta dismissed 51 intra-court appeals challenging VAT assessment notices issued by the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Commissioner, holding that the appellants had an adequate alternative statutory remedy through the newly constituted Appellate Tribunal and therefore should not invoke writ jurisdiction. The court found the single judge's reasoned order sound, rejecting arguments about limitation periods, natural justice violations, and procedural defects, and directing pre-August 19, 2025 cases to the Tribunal while dismissing post-August 19, 2025 cases on grounds of alternative remedy availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court at Calcutta dismissed 51 intra-court appeals challenging VAT assessment notices issued by the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Commissioner, holding that the appellants had an adequate alternative statutory remedy through the newly constituted Appellate Tribunal and therefore should not invoke writ jurisdiction. The court found the single judge's reasoned order sound, rejecting arguments about limitation periods, natural justice violations, and procedural defects, and directing pre-August 19, 2025 cases to the Tribunal while dismissing post-August 19, 2025 cases on grounds of alternative remedy availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts