SMTI.USHA MOORTHY K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI vs THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS. — MAT /38/2026
Case under Andaman and Nicobar Islands Value Added Tax Regulation, 2017 Section NA. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0002662026
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
MAT /38/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
MAT /38/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
SALES TAX ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMTI.USHA MOORTHY K.BHAWANI, ADARSH ILANGO, SOHINI BISWAS, DEB KUMAR BAWALI
Respondent(s)
THE LT.GOVERNOR AND ORS.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER,
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (VAT)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 19-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) dismissed 48 appeals challenging VAT assessment notices issued by the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Commissioner. The court upheld the Single Judge's decision, finding that an adequate statutory appeal remedy exists before the newly constituted Appellate Tribunal, and therefore the High Court should not exercise its writ jurisdiction under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) dismissed 48 appeals challenging VAT assessment notices issued by the Andaman and Nicobar Islands Commissioner. The court upheld the Single Judge's decision, finding that an adequate statutory appeal remedy exists before the newly constituted Appellate Tribunal, and therefore the High Court should not exercise its writ jurisdiction under Article 226. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts