MOHARAM BIBI YASMEEN BEGUM vs THE TEHSILDAR AND ANR — WPA/107/2026
Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0002222026
Filing Number
WPA/107/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/107/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHARAM BIBI YASMEEN BEGUM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE TEHSILDAR AND ANR
-
2.SMTI.JHARNA GHARAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) allowed the writ petition by directing the Tehsildar (Respondent No.1) to dispose of RC Case No.602/TSVP/2025 within a reasonable period after providing a hearing opportunity to both the petitioner and respondent no.2. The court modified the petitioner's prayer for disposal within 3 months to a more flexible "reasonable period" standard while maintaining procedural fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/107/2026
The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) allowed the writ petition by directing the Tehsildar (Respondent No.1) to dispose of RC Case No.602/TSVP/2025 within a reasonable period after providing a hearing opportunity to both the petitioner and respondent no.2. The court modified the petitioner's prayer for disposal within 3 months to a more flexible "reasonable period" standard while maintaining procedural fairness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts