M/S SAKTHI BUILDERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR G.BINNU KUMAR, MANISHA MONDAL vs SHRI.KALE AMIT MARUTIRAO, IAS — CPAN/10/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act ,1971 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0002192026
Filing Number
CPAN/10/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
CPAN/10/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Civil Contempt ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S SAKTHI BUILDERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR G.BINNU KUMAR, MANISHA MONDAL
-
2.SHRI.J.SASI KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI.KALE AMIT MARUTIRAO, IAS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) disposed of the contempt petition against IAS officer Kale Amit Marutirao after finding full compliance with its March 31, 2026 order. The respondent waived the penalty component and released the seized quarry/minor mineral products to Sakthi Builders India Private Limited with a proper Release Memo. The contempt proceeding was dropped with the petitioner's consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Tirthankar GhoshView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Contempt Application
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CPAN/10/2026
The High Court at Calcutta (Port Blair Circuit Bench) disposed of the contempt petition against IAS officer Kale Amit Marutirao after finding full compliance with its March 31, 2026 order. The respondent waived the penalty component and released the seized quarry/minor mineral products to Sakthi Builders India Private Limited with a proper Release Memo. The contempt proceeding was dropped with the petitioner's consent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts