P.JAZEEL AHMED AND ORS MOHAMMED TABRAIZ, RAKESH PAL GOBIND vs THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND ORS. — WPA/88/2026
Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 27th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0001922026
Filing Number
WPA /88/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
WPA /88/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Bench Type
SINGLE BENCH
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.JAZEEL AHMED AND ORS MOHAMMED TABRAIZ, RAKESH PAL GOBIND
NEERAJ KUMAR RAM
ANISH BALA
MOHAMMED TANZEEM
Respondent(s)
THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND ORS.
ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION
THE SECRETARY HIGH EDUCATION
PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
NEW MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-02-2026 | NEW MOTION | |
| 27-04-2026 | MOTION | |
| 23-04-2026 | MOTION | |
| 16-04-2026 | MOTION | |
| 19-03-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
Summary The Calcutta High Court (Port Blair Circuit Bench) disposed of the writ petition after the Ministry of Education clarified its policy: students admitted through 2025-26 will continue under Pondicherry University, while from 2026-27 onwards, admissions and degrees will be under NSCBIHL (Deemed to be University), Port Blair. The court found the petitioner's grievance redressed and held the Ministry bound by this policy decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Calcutta High Court (Port Blair Circuit Bench) disposed of the writ petition after the Ministry of Education clarified its policy: students admitted through 2025-26 will continue under Pondicherry University, while from 2026-27 onwards, admissions and degrees will be under NSCBIHL (Deemed to be University), Port Blair. The court found the petitioner's grievance redressed and held the Ministry bound by this policy decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts