SHRI.ALOK DAS ARUL PRASANTH vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WP.CT/5/2026
Case under Article 226 of Constitution of India Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0000882026
Filing Number
WP.CT /5/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
WP.CT /5/2026
Registration Date
29-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
REINSTATEMENT ( 13 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI.ALOK DAS ARUL PRASANTH
Respondent(s)
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
THE SECRETARY
THE LT.GOVERNOR
THE CHIEF SECRETARY
THE SECRETARY (EDUCATION)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMITA DAS DE
NEW MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
MOTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-02-2026 | NEW MOTION | |
| 16-04-2026 | MOTION | |
| 18-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 11-03-2026 | MOTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | MOTION |
Orders
Court Decision Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition of Shri Alok Das, upholding the termination of his service as a Graduate Trained Teacher (GTT). The court found that Das was ineligible for the GTT position because he lacked three years of continuous service in the same cadre—his prior service as Multi-Tasking Staff (MTS) was deemed fundamentally different in nature and could not satisfy the eligibility requirement under the Vacancy Notice. The court also rejected the argument that termination without a disciplinary inquiry violated natural justice, holding that since the dismissal was merely a recall of an ineligible appointment (non-punitive), no prior inquiry was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition of Shri Alok Das, upholding the termination of his service as a Graduate Trained Teacher (GTT). The court found that Das was ineligible for the GTT position because he lacked three years of continuous service in the same cadre—his prior service as Multi-Tasking Staff (MTS) was deemed fundamentally different in nature and could not satisfy the eligibility requirement under the Vacancy Notice. The court also rejected the argument that termination without a disciplinary inquiry violated natural justice, holding that since the dismissal was merely a recall of an ineligible appointment (non-punitive), no prior inquiry was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts