SHRI.RAJESH KUMAR N.A.KHAN, SHAHEEN RAZEEN vs SMTI. B.USHA — FA /1/2026

Case under Nature of Mandamus , Section NA. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCP0000802026

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

FAT /1/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

FA /1/2026

Registration Date

29-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Divorce ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Acts & Sections

Nature of Mandamus , Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SHRI.RAJESH KUMAR N.A.KHAN, SHAHEEN RAZEEN

Respondent(s)

SMTI. B.USHA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)

30-01-2026

FOR ADMISSION

16-04-2026

FOR HEARING

23-03-2026

FOR HEARING

12-03-2026

FOR HEARING

09-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE(DAS)

Summary: In appeal FA/1/2026 between Shri Rajesh Kumar and Smt B. Usha before the High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench at Port Blair), the court accepted the appellant's paper book and ordered it to be kept on record with a copy provided to the respondent's advocate. The appeal has been adjourned and listed for hearing in the next available Circuit Bench session. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In appeal FA/1/2026 between Shri Rajesh Kumar and Smt B. Usha before the High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench at Port Blair), the court accepted the appellant's paper book and ordered it to be kept on record with a copy provided to the respondent's advocate. The appeal has been adjourned and listed for hearing in the next available Circuit Bench session. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case