ARJUN SINGH ANJILI NAG vs DINESH KUMAR SHARMA — SA/2/2024
Case under Andaman and Nicobar Islands Land Revenue and Land Reforms Rules, 1968 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCP0000502020
Next Hearing
18th March 2021
Filing Number
SAT /5/2020
Filing Date
10-06-2020
Registration No
SA /2/2024
Registration Date
10-06-2020
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Landlord-Tenant Dispute ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARJUN SINGH ANJILI NAG
Respondent(s)
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
APPLICATION
RETURNABLE MOTION
RETURNABLE MOTION
RETURNABLE MOTION
SPECIALLY FIXED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2021 | APPLICATION | |
| 29-01-2026 | RETURNABLE MOTION | |
| 17-06-2025 | RETURNABLE MOTION | |
| 12-06-2025 | RETURNABLE MOTION | |
| 07-10-2024 | SPECIALLY FIXED MATTERS |
Orders
Summary The Calcutta High Court set aside the appellate court's judgment and reinstated the trial court's eviction decree against the tenant. The court held that the appellate court erred in reversing the eviction solely on technical grounds regarding notice formalities, when the tenant had already defaulted on rent payments since 2012 and both parties had agreed to lease termination through their correspondence. The tenant was ordered to vacate within one month and pay outstanding rental arrears of approximately Rs. 6.78 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Calcutta High Court set aside the appellate court's judgment and reinstated the trial court's eviction decree against the tenant. The court held that the appellate court erred in reversing the eviction solely on technical grounds regarding notice formalities, when the tenant had already defaulted on rent payments since 2012 and both parties had agreed to lease termination through their correspondence. The tenant was ordered to vacate within one month and pay outstanding rental arrears of approximately Rs. 6.78 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts