HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED SOUDIP PAL CHOUDHURY vs M/S NARMADA EQUIPMENT AND SPARES COMPANY — APO/10/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 37. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 05th February 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0048432024
Filing Number
APOT /427/2024
Filing Date
20-12-2024
Registration No
APO /10/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2024
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Bench Type
Division Bench
Judicial Branch
APPEAL SECTION
Decision Date
05th February 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED SOUDIP PAL CHOUDHURY
Respondent(s)
M/S NARMADA EQUIPMENT AND SPARES COMPANY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
NEW APPLICATIONS
APPEALS FROM ORDERS
APPEALS FROM ORDERS
APPEALS FROM ORDERS
APPEALS FROM ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-01-2025 | NEW APPLICATIONS | |
| 05-02-2026 | APPEALS FROM ORDERS | |
| 04-02-2026 | APPEALS FROM ORDERS | |
| 03-02-2026 | APPEALS FROM ORDERS | |
| 02-02-2026 | APPEALS FROM ORDERS |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta recalled an April 13, 2026 order that had directed corrections to a March 30, 2026 judgment in the case between Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited and M/s. Narmada Equipment and Spares Company. The court found that the corrective order was improper because it was passed by the Commercial Division while the appeal was pending in the Non-Commercial Division. The Department has been directed to redact all corrections that were incorporated pursuant to the recalled order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta recalled an April 13, 2026 order that had directed corrections to a March 30, 2026 judgment in the case between Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited and M/s. Narmada Equipment and Spares Company. The court found that the corrective order was improper because it was passed by the Commercial Division while the appeal was pending in the Non-Commercial Division. The Department has been directed to redact all corrections that were incorporated pursuant to the recalled order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts