RAHUL JAISWAL KOUSHIK BHATTACHARYYA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPO/926/2025

Case under Police Act ,1949 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0048272025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPO/929/2025

Filing Date

23-12-2025

Registration No

WPO/926/2025

Registration Date

23-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Police ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Police Act ,1949 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

RAHUL JAISWAL KOUSHIK BHATTACHARYYA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

08-01-2026

COURT APPLICATIONS UNDER ART.226

04-05-2026

COURT APPLICATIONS UNDER ART.226

12-03-2026

COURT APPLICATIONS UNDER ART.226

12-02-2026

COURT APPLICATIONS UNDER ART.226

22-01-2026

COURT APPLICATIONS UNDER ART.226

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Case Summary: WPO/926/2025 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Rahul Jaiswal against the State of West Bengal, finding that the underlying dispute concerning a development agreement was civil in nature and not appropriate for police intervention. The court held that since adequate alternative remedies were available—including pursuing the pending title suit (No. 2879 of 2025) in Civil Court or approaching the Magistrate under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 regarding police inaction—the writ petition could not be entertained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPO/926/2025 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the writ petition filed by Rahul Jaiswal against the State of West Bengal, finding that the underlying dispute concerning a development agreement was civil in nature and not appropriate for police intervention. The court held that since adequate alternative remedies were available—including pursuing the pending title suit (No. 2879 of 2025) in Civil Court or approaching the Magistrate under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 regarding police inaction—the writ petition could not be entertained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case