POULOMY GHOSH AND ORS ANITA SHAW vs REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA AND ORS — WPO/1192/2024

Case under No Act Section NA. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0046952024

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

WPO /1200/2024

Filing Date

13-12-2024

Registration No

WPO /1192/2024

Registration Date

13-12-2024

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Services ( 24 )

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Acts & Sections

NO ACT Section NA

Petitioner(s)

POULOMY GHOSH AND ORS ANITA SHAW

Respondent(s)

REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

17-12-2024

COURT APPLICATIONS UNDER ART.226

19-06-2026

SPECIALLY ASSIGNED MATTERS

17-04-2026

SPECIALLY ASSIGNED MATTERS

06-03-2026

SPECIALLY ASSIGNED MATTERS

27-02-2026

SPECIALLY ASSIGNED MATTERS

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

CASE ADJOURNED The High Court at Calcutta adjourned the writ petition (WPO/1192/2024) filed by Poulomy Ghosh and others against the Registrar General. The respondent (High Court Administration) was directed to file an affidavit-in-opposition by June 10, 2026, with the petitioner allowed to file a reply affidavit by June 17, 2026. The matter is listed for further consideration on June 19, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE ADJOURNED The High Court at Calcutta adjourned the writ petition (WPO/1192/2024) filed by Poulomy Ghosh and others against the Registrar General. The respondent (High Court Administration) was directed to file an affidavit-in-opposition by June 10, 2026, with the petitioner allowed to file a reply affidavit by June 17, 2026. The matter is listed for further consideration on June 19, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case