VINOD KUMAR MITTAL SUNITA AGARWAL vs SUKESH ROY AND ANOTHER — CS-COM/165/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCO0043092025

e-Filing Number

26-11-2025

Filing Number

CS-COM/130/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

CS-COM/165/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD KUMAR MITTAL SUNITA AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKESH ROY AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha RoyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court at Calcutta allowed the application for extension of time to file a written statement by Defendant No. 1 in the suit Vinod Kumar Mittal v. Sukesh Roy and Another. The court extended the time to file the written statement by two weeks from the date of the order, subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- as cost to the Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee, with the money receipt to be produced at the time of filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha RoyView PDF

  4. 28-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha RoyView PDF

  5. 28-Nov-2025

    Presentation Of Plaint

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

  6. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS-COM/165/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court at Calcutta allowed the application for extension of time to file a written statement by Defendant No. 1 in the suit Vinod Kumar Mittal v. Sukesh Roy and Another. The court extended the time to file the written statement by two weeks from the date of the order, subject to payment of Rs. 5,000/- as cost to the Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee, with the money receipt to be produced at the time of filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case