L AND T FINANCE LIMITED Paritosh Sinha vs J B And Company — AP-COM/838/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 9. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0040762025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

07-11-2025

Filing Number

AP-COM /797/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2025

Registration No

AP-COM /838/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Decision Date

13th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

L AND T FINANCE LIMITED Paritosh Sinha

Respondent(s)

J B And Company

Darshak Bhaskarray Upadhyay

Bhavya Darshakkumar Upadhyay

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

24-11-2025

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 9)

06-04-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 9)

01-04-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 9)

24-02-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 9)

02-02-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 9)

Orders

13-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed L and T Finance Limited's petition against J B and Company as infructuous, finding that the arbitral tribunal had already been constituted, thereby rendering the court's intervention unnecessary. Justice Gaurang Kanth held that since the underlying dispute was now proceeding to arbitration, the petition no longer served any purpose and was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed L and T Finance Limited's petition against J B and Company as infructuous, finding that the arbitral tribunal had already been constituted, thereby rendering the court's intervention unnecessary. Justice Gaurang Kanth held that since the underlying dispute was now proceeding to arbitration, the petition no longer served any purpose and was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case