MOTI FINVEST PRIVATE LIMIOTED PRADEEP KUMAR JEWRAJKA vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — APO/69/2025

Case under Income-tax Act ,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 18th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0037292025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

APO/30/2025

Filing Date

22-09-2025

Registration No

APO/69/2025

Registration Date

22-09-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

FOREIGN EXCHANGE ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Decision Date

18th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Acts & Sections

Income-tax Act ,1961 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

MOTI FINVEST PRIVATE LIMIOTED PRADEEP KUMAR JEWRAJKA

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ , HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

18-11-2025

FOR ADMISSION (INCOME TAX MATTERS)

18-05-2026

TO BE MENTIONED

15-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

14-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

13-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

18-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ,HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS)

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appeal filed by Moti Finvest Private Limited against the Union of India as withdrawn on 18th May, 2026. The appellant's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the appeal along with the connected application, which the court granted. Written instructions filed by the appellant were retained on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appeal filed by Moti Finvest Private Limited against the Union of India as withdrawn on 18th May, 2026. The appellant's counsel sought and obtained leave to withdraw the appeal along with the connected application, which the court granted. Written instructions filed by the appellant were retained on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case