BAHUBALI ESTATES LIMITED AVIRUP CHATTERJEE vs TAGGAS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED AND ANR. — APOT/239/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0032782025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

APOT /244/2025

Filing Date

26-08-2025

Registration No

APOT /239/2025

Registration Date

26-08-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

BAHUBALI ESTATES LIMITED AVIRUP CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

TAGGAS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED AND ANR.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

04-09-2025

NEW APPLICATIONS

10-04-2026

APPEALS FROM ORDERS

09-04-2026

APPEALS FROM ORDERS

08-04-2026

APPEALS FROM ORDERS

07-04-2026

APPEALS FROM ORDERS

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK,HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the appeal (APOT/239/2025) after the plaintiffs/respondents stated they did not wish to proceed with the suit. Since continuing the appeal would serve no fruitful purpose, the court disposed of the matter and left the substantive issues raised by the parties unresolved, directing the plaintiffs to approach the Trial Judge for appropriate orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta disposed of the appeal (APOT/239/2025) after the plaintiffs/respondents stated they did not wish to proceed with the suit. Since continuing the appeal would serve no fruitful purpose, the court disposed of the matter and left the substantive issues raised by the parties unresolved, directing the plaintiffs to approach the Trial Judge for appropriate orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case