COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE KOLKATA Tapan Bhanja vs RAGHENDRA KUMAR DHURIYA — CUSTA/39/2025

Case under Customs Act ,1962 Section 130. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0031942025

Next Hearing

03rd August 2026

e-Filing Number

20-08-2025

Filing Number

CUSTA/39/2025

Filing Date

20-08-2025

Registration No

CUSTA/39/2025

Registration Date

20-08-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ , HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ , HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Acts & Sections

Customs Act ,1962 Section 130

Petitioner(s)

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE KOLKATA Tapan Bhanja

Respondent(s)

RAGHENDRA KUMAR DHURIYA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ , HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR

18-09-2025

NEW APPLICATIONS - I

03-08-2026

FOR HEARING - TAX MATTERS (WITHOUT PAPER BOOK)

07-05-2026

NEW APPLICATIONS (TAX MATTERS)

06-05-2026

NEW APPLICATIONS (TAX MATTERS)

05-05-2026

NEW APPLICATIONS (TAX MATTERS)

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ,HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR

Case Summary: CUSTA/39/2025 Outcome: The appeal was admitted on three substantial questions of law regarding gold seizure and confiscation. The court directed the appellant (Commissioner of Customs) to file informal paper books within 10 weeks and scheduled the case for August 2026 hearing. No final judgment on the merits has been rendered yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CUSTA/39/2025 Outcome: The appeal was admitted on three substantial questions of law regarding gold seizure and confiscation. The court directed the appellant (Commissioner of Customs) to file informal paper books within 10 weeks and scheduled the case for August 2026 hearing. No final judgment on the merits has been rendered yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case