WEST BENGAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED SAUNAK SARBAJNA vs M/S GTZ INDIA PVT LTD AND ORS. — AO-COM/28/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0028602024
e-Filing Number
24-07-2024
Filing Number
APOT /282/2024
Filing Date
24-07-2024
Registration No
AO-COM /28/2024
Registration Date
24-07-2024
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
APPEAL SECTION
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
WEST BENGAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED SAUNAK SARBAJNA
Respondent(s)
M/S GTZ INDIA PVT LTD AND ORS.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
NEW APPLICATIONS - I
APPEALS FROM ORDERS
NEW APPLICATIONS
NEW APPLICATIONS
NEW APPLICATIONS - I
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-08-2024 | NEW APPLICATIONS - I | |
| 11-11-2024 | APPEALS FROM ORDERS | |
| 09-09-2024 | NEW APPLICATIONS | |
| 05-09-2024 | NEW APPLICATIONS | |
| 04-09-2024 | NEW APPLICATIONS - I |
Orders
The Calcutta High Court declined to grant an interim injunction against GTZ India Pvt Ltd in West Bengal Chemical Industries' patent infringement case involving an anaemia medicine, finding that while a prima facie case exists, public health concerns and balance of convenience weigh against stopping production. Instead, the court ordered defendants to file quarterly sales accounts with the Registrar as an interim measure to preserve evidence, while allowing the pending patent revocation application to proceed independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Calcutta High Court declined to grant an interim injunction against GTZ India Pvt Ltd in West Bengal Chemical Industries' patent infringement case involving an anaemia medicine, finding that while a prima facie case exists, public health concerns and balance of convenience weigh against stopping production. Instead, the court ordered defendants to file quarterly sales accounts with the Registrar as an interim measure to preserve evidence, while allowing the pending patent revocation application to proceed independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts