BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD ELECTRONICS DIV. ARINDAM PAUL vs OPTIMAL POWER SYNERGY INDIA PVT LTD — APO/41/2022

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0024992022

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

APOT /58/2022

Filing Date

28-03-2022

Registration No

APO /41/2022

Registration Date

28-03-2022

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD ELECTRONICS DIV. ARINDAM PAUL

Respondent(s)

OPTIMAL POWER SYNERGY INDIA PVT LTD

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

30-03-2022

APPEALS FROM ORDERS

08-05-2026

APPEALS FROM ORDERS

07-05-2026

APPEALS FROM ORDERS

06-05-2026

APPEALS FROM ORDERS

05-05-2026

APPEALS FROM ORDERS

Orders

13-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK,HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

The High Court at Calcutta set aside the May 23, 2022 judgment as a nullity because the judge who passed it was not designated under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, despite the case involving a commercial dispute exceeding Rs. 1 crore. The court remanded the case to the Commercial Division and directed the appellant to renew its lapsed bank guarantee within 7 days or face dismissal of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta set aside the May 23, 2022 judgment as a nullity because the judge who passed it was not designated under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, despite the case involving a commercial dispute exceeding Rs. 1 crore. The court remanded the case to the Commercial Division and directed the appellant to renew its lapsed bank guarantee within 7 days or face dismissal of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case