IN THE GOODS OF- BAL KISHAN JHAWAR (DEC.) -AND- SHRUTI JHAWAR SC AND A LEGAL vs NA — APOT/104/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act ,1925 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCO0019472026

Filing Number

APOT/106/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

APOT/104/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Testamentary ( 53 )

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act ,1925 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IN THE GOODS OF- BAL KISHAN JHAWAR (DEC.) -AND- SHRUTI JHAWAR SC AND A LEGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appeal (APOT/104/2026) filed by Shruti Jhawar against the May 5, 2026 order directing mediation. The court found that the impugned order was merely procedural (directing mediation steps) and did not decide any substantive rights of the parties, making it not appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, 1865. The appeal and all pending applications were dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    New Applications

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APOT/104/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appeal (APOT/104/2026) filed by Shruti Jhawar against the May 5, 2026 order directing mediation. The court found that the impugned order was merely procedural (directing mediation steps) and did not decide any substantive rights of the parties, making it not appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, 1865. The appeal and all pending applications were dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case