SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED M/S. MULLICK AND CO. vs S G CORPORATION JOINT VENTURE AND ORS — AP-COM/409/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 29A(4)and(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0019082026
e-Filing Number
21-05-2026
Filing Number
AP-COM/390/2026
Filing Date
22-05-2026
Registration No
AP-COM/409/2026
Registration Date
22-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED M/S. MULLICK AND CO.
Respondent(s)
S G CORPORATION JOINT VENTURE AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 29 A)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 29 A) |
Orders
Case Summary: The High Court at Calcutta extended the arbitral tribunal's mandate by six months (from June 12, 2026) under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. SREI Equipment Finance sought the extension to conclude proceedings against S G Corporation Joint Venture, which failed to participate and was proceeded ex-parte. The court found no undue delay by the arbitrator and, given the advanced stage of final arguments, granted the extension requesting the arbitrator complete proceedings within the new timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The High Court at Calcutta extended the arbitral tribunal's mandate by six months (from June 12, 2026) under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. SREI Equipment Finance sought the extension to conclude proceedings against S G Corporation Joint Venture, which failed to participate and was proceeded ex-parte. The court found no undue delay by the arbitrator and, given the advanced stage of final arguments, granted the extension requesting the arbitrator complete proceedings within the new timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts