CHITTARANJAN GHOSH SUTANU KARMAKAR vs SABHPRALA INTERNATIONAL LLP AND OTHERS — CS-COM/74/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCO0018852026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

CS-COM/58/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

CS-COM/74/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHITTARANJAN GHOSH SUTANU KARMAKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SABHPRALA INTERNATIONAL LLP AND OTHERS

  2. 2.VENKATARAMAN SRINIVASAN

  3. 3.BHUPINDER RAGHUVANSHI ALIAS SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAGHAV

  4. 4.AMBIKA SANKAR MISHRA

  5. 5.PRAKASH MONDAL

  6. 6.Axis Bank Limited

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: CS-COM/74/2024 The High Court at Calcutta admitted the plaint filed by Chittaranjan Ghosh against Sabhprala International LLP and others, granting leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865. The court noted that pre-litigation mediation had failed as per the December 9, 2025 report. The plaint was admitted subject to departmental scrutiny. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Presentation Of Plaint

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS-COM/74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CS-COM/74/2024 The High Court at Calcutta admitted the plaint filed by Chittaranjan Ghosh against Sabhprala International LLP and others, granting leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865. The court noted that pre-litigation mediation had failed as per the December 9, 2025 report. The plaint was admitted subject to departmental scrutiny. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case