TECHNO ELECTRIC AND ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED vs BENGAL ENERGY LIMITED — AP-COM/402/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section SECTION29ASUBSECTION4. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCO0018762026

e-Filing Number

21-05-2026

Filing Number

AP-COM/383/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

AP-COM/402/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section SECTION29ASUBSECTION4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TECHNO ELECTRIC AND ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. Orijit Chatterjee

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BENGAL ENERGY LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta extended the mandate of the arbitral tribunal by six months (until November 26, 2026) under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court found no undue delay by the current arbitrator (Mr. Utpal Bose), noted the proceedings were at final hearing stage after 53+ sittings, and granted the extension with the respondent's consent. The arbitrator was requested to conclude proceedings and publish the award within the extended period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    New Motions (Section 29 A)

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AP-COM/402/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta extended the mandate of the arbitral tribunal by six months (until November 26, 2026) under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court found no undue delay by the current arbitrator (Mr. Utpal Bose), noted the proceedings were at final hearing stage after 53+ sittings, and granted the extension with the respondent's consent. The arbitrator was requested to conclude proceedings and publish the award within the extended period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case