SHREE RAMDOOT ROLLERS PVT LTD MOUMITA BHATTACHARJEE vs BHANDARI BUILDERS AND HARDWARE — CS-COM/71/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCO0018412026

e-Filing Number

20-05-2026

Filing Number

CS-COM/55/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

CS-COM/71/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHREE RAMDOOT ROLLERS PVT LTD MOUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHANDARI BUILDERS AND HARDWARE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: CS-COM/71/2026 In this commercial dispute between Shree Ramdoot Rollers Pvt. Ltd. and Bhandari Builders and Hardware, the High Court at Calcutta admitted the plaint on June 10, 2026. Justice Aniruddha Roy granted leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865, after finding that pre-litigation mediation had failed (as evidenced by the non-starter report dated March 27, 2026). The plaint was admitted subject to departmental scrutiny. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Presentation Of Plaint

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS-COM/71/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CS-COM/71/2026 In this commercial dispute between Shree Ramdoot Rollers Pvt. Ltd. and Bhandari Builders and Hardware, the High Court at Calcutta admitted the plaint on June 10, 2026. Justice Aniruddha Roy granted leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865, after finding that pre-litigation mediation had failed (as evidenced by the non-starter report dated March 27, 2026). The plaint was admitted subject to departmental scrutiny. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case