SHREE RAMDOOT ROLLERS PVT LTD MOUMITA BHATTACHARJEE vs BHANDARI BUILDERS AND HARDWARE — CS-COM/71/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCO0018412026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

20-05-2026

Filing Number

CS-COM/55/2026

Filing Date

21-05-2026

Registration No

CS-COM/71/2026

Registration Date

21-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SHREE RAMDOOT ROLLERS PVT LTD MOUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

Respondent(s)

BHANDARI BUILDERS AND HARDWARE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

10-06-2026

PRESENTATION OF PLAINT

Orders

10-06-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

Case Summary: CS-COM/71/2026 In this commercial dispute between Shree Ramdoot Rollers Pvt. Ltd. and Bhandari Builders and Hardware, the High Court at Calcutta admitted the plaint on June 10, 2026. Justice Aniruddha Roy granted leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865, after finding that pre-litigation mediation had failed (as evidenced by the non-starter report dated March 27, 2026). The plaint was admitted subject to departmental scrutiny. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CS-COM/71/2026 In this commercial dispute between Shree Ramdoot Rollers Pvt. Ltd. and Bhandari Builders and Hardware, the High Court at Calcutta admitted the plaint on June 10, 2026. Justice Aniruddha Roy granted leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865, after finding that pre-litigation mediation had failed (as evidenced by the non-starter report dated March 27, 2026). The plaint was admitted subject to departmental scrutiny. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case