ISHWAR CHAND GUPTA TAPAS SINGHA ROY vs ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA AND ORS — APOT/94/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0017962026
Filing Number
APOT/96/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
APOT/94/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
APPEAL SECTION
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ISHWAR CHAND GUPTA TAPAS SINGHA ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF
Case Summary: APOT/94/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appellant's appeal against the trial judge's partial allowance of the plaintiff's plaint amendment in a partition and accounts suit. The court held that the amendments do not change the suit's nature and character, do not introduce new causes of action, and do not prejudice defendants who are given opportunity to file additional written statements. The limitation issue regarding accounts dating to 2008 was kept open for trial determination. Defendants were granted two weeks to file additional written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
New Applications
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi
-
11-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APOT/94/2026
Case Summary: APOT/94/2026 The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appellant's appeal against the trial judge's partial allowance of the plaintiff's plaint amendment in a partition and accounts suit. The court held that the amendments do not change the suit's nature and character, do not introduce new causes of action, and do not prejudice defendants who are given opportunity to file additional written statements. The limitation issue regarding accounts dating to 2008 was kept open for trial determination. Defendants were granted two weeks to file additional written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts