RABINDRA BARMAN PAYEL SHOME vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER,RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LIMITED — AP/85/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11/6. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

CNR: WBCHCO0017342026

Filing Number

AP/82/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

AP/85/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11/6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABINDRA BARMAN PAYEL SHOME

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE REGIONAL MANAGER,RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LIMITED

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jul-2026

    New Motions (Section 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

    Case Summary: AP/85/2026 The High Court at Calcutta found that the petition between Rabindra Barman and Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited was erroneously filed in the non-commercial side, as the dispute qualifies as a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court directed the registry to re-number the application within two weeks and listed the matter in the Commercial Division after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AP/85/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AP/85/2026 The High Court at Calcutta found that the petition between Rabindra Barman and Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited was erroneously filed in the non-commercial side, as the dispute qualifies as a commercial dispute under Section 2(1)(c) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court directed the registry to re-number the application within two weeks and listed the matter in the Commercial Division after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case