GPS NIRMAN PRIVATE LIMITED SANKHA SUBHRA RAY vs BINOY SHANKAR CHAKRABORTY AND ANOTHER — AP/84/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11/6. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

Next hearing 14-Jul-2026

CNR: WBCHCO0017272026

Filing Number

AP/81/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

AP/84/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11/6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GPS NIRMAN PRIVATE LIMITED SANKHA SUBHRA RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BINOY SHANKAR CHAKRABORTY AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. 14-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-Jul-2026

    New Motions (Section 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

    Case Summary: AP/84/2026 GPS Nirman Private Limited sought constitution of an arbitral tribunal under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a Development Agreement dated 18th February, 2022 with Binoy Shankar Chakraborty and another. However, both parties' counsel agreed that amicable settlement was possible. The High Court at Calcutta referred the matter to the Mediation Centre for settlement exploration with a Senior Mediator appointed, and adjourned the case for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AP/84/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AP/84/2026 GPS Nirman Private Limited sought constitution of an arbitral tribunal under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a Development Agreement dated 18th February, 2022 with Binoy Shankar Chakraborty and another. However, both parties' counsel agreed that amicable settlement was possible. The High Court at Calcutta referred the matter to the Mediation Centre for settlement exploration with a Senior Mediator appointed, and adjourned the case for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case