SHRI SNEHASISH BHAUMIK PROPRIETOR OF NORTH BENGAL TOURS AND TRAVELS vs INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND ORS — CS-COM/54/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCO0015622026

e-Filing Number

28-04-2026

Filing Number

CS-COM/45/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CS-COM/54/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI SNEHASISH BHAUMIK PROPRIETOR OF NORTH BENGAL TOURS AND TRAVELS

    Adv. RAJIB MULLICK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD AND ORS

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: CS-COM/54/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Commercial Division) heard a dispute between Shri Snehasish Bhaumik, proprietor of North Bengal Tours and Travels, and Indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd and others on May 6, 2026. The Court rejected the plaintiff's prayer for leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865, finding it unnecessary since all defendants conduct business within the Court's territorial jurisdiction. The plaint was admitted subject to departmental scrutiny, and pre-litigation mediation between the parties had failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Presentation Of Plaint

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS-COM/54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CS-COM/54/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Commercial Division) heard a dispute between Shri Snehasish Bhaumik, proprietor of North Bengal Tours and Travels, and Indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd and others on May 6, 2026. The Court rejected the plaintiff's prayer for leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865, finding it unnecessary since all defendants conduct business within the Court's territorial jurisdiction. The plaint was admitted subject to departmental scrutiny, and pre-litigation mediation between the parties had failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case