INDIAN CITY PROPERTIES LTD AND ANR MUKHERJEE PRASAD AND ASSOCIATES vs THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS — WPO/362/2024
Case under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section N. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0015182024
Filing Number
WPO /368/2024
Filing Date
19-04-2024
Registration No
WPO /362/2024
Registration Date
19-04-2024
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INDIAN CITY PROPERTIES LTD AND ANR MUKHERJEE PRASAD AND ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
COURT APPLICATIONS UNDER ART.226
PART HEARD MATTERS
PART HEARD MATTERS
PART HEARD MATTERS
PART HEARD MATTERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-04-2024 | COURT APPLICATIONS UNDER ART.226 | |
| 15-12-2025 | PART HEARD MATTERS | |
| 08-12-2025 | PART HEARD MATTERS | |
| 01-12-2025 | PART HEARD MATTERS | |
| 24-11-2025 | PART HEARD MATTERS |
Orders
Court Decision Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 232B and the proviso to Section 180(2) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. The court held that these provisions are constitutional transitional measures designed to enable completion of property tax assessments for periods before the Unit Area Assessment (UAA) system's introduction, and operate prospectively without retroactively imposing unlimited burdens on property owners. However, the court set aside the specific revaluation notices issued to the petitioner and allowed the municipal corporation to initiate fresh proceedings in compliance with established legal limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 232B and the proviso to Section 180(2) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. The court held that these provisions are constitutional transitional measures designed to enable completion of property tax assessments for periods before the Unit Area Assessment (UAA) system's introduction, and operate prospectively without retroactively imposing unlimited burdens on property owners. However, the court set aside the specific revaluation notices issued to the petitioner and allowed the municipal corporation to initiate fresh proceedings in compliance with established legal limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts