INDIAN CITY PROPERTIES LTD AND ANR MUKHERJEE PRASAD AND ASSOCIATES vs THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS — WPO/362/2024

Case under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section N. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0015182024

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WPO /368/2024

Filing Date

19-04-2024

Registration No

WPO /362/2024

Registration Date

19-04-2024

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section N

Petitioner(s)

INDIAN CITY PROPERTIES LTD AND ANR MUKHERJEE PRASAD AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

24-04-2024

COURT APPLICATIONS UNDER ART.226

15-12-2025

PART HEARD MATTERS

08-12-2025

PART HEARD MATTERS

01-12-2025

PART HEARD MATTERS

24-11-2025

PART HEARD MATTERS

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Court Decision Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 232B and the proviso to Section 180(2) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. The court held that these provisions are constitutional transitional measures designed to enable completion of property tax assessments for periods before the Unit Area Assessment (UAA) system's introduction, and operate prospectively without retroactively imposing unlimited burdens on property owners. However, the court set aside the specific revaluation notices issued to the petitioner and allowed the municipal corporation to initiate fresh proceedings in compliance with established legal limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Calcutta High Court dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 232B and the proviso to Section 180(2) of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. The court held that these provisions are constitutional transitional measures designed to enable completion of property tax assessments for periods before the Unit Area Assessment (UAA) system's introduction, and operate prospectively without retroactively imposing unlimited burdens on property owners. However, the court set aside the specific revaluation notices issued to the petitioner and allowed the municipal corporation to initiate fresh proceedings in compliance with established legal limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case