EMTA COAL LIMITED SANDIP AGARWAL AND CO. vs LARSEN AND TOURBO LIMITED — AP-COM/302/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 29A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0015142026
e-Filing Number
23-04-2026
Filing Number
AP-COM/289/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
AP-COM/302/2026
Registration Date
24-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT
Decision Date
18-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EMTA COAL LIMITED SANDIP AGARWAL AND CO.
Respondent(s)
-
1.LARSEN AND TOURBO LIMITED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF
Case Summary: AP-COM/302/2026 The High Court at Calcutta granted EMTA Coal Limited's petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the sole arbitrator's mandate by eight months to conclude proceedings and publish the award in the dispute with Larsen and Tourbo Limited. The Court found no undue delay by the arbitrator and, considering the proceedings were at final arguments stage, granted the extension in the interest of justice, with both parties consenting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-May-2026
New Motions (Section 29 A)
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AP-COM/302/2026
Case Summary: AP-COM/302/2026 The High Court at Calcutta granted EMTA Coal Limited's petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the sole arbitrator's mandate by eight months to conclude proceedings and publish the award in the dispute with Larsen and Tourbo Limited. The Court found no undue delay by the arbitrator and, considering the proceedings were at final arguments stage, granted the extension in the interest of justice, with both parties consenting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts