EMTA COAL LIMITED SANDIP AGARWAL AND CO. vs LARSEN AND TOURBO LIMITED — AP-COM/302/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 29A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0015142026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

23-04-2026

Filing Number

AP-COM/289/2026

Filing Date

24-04-2026

Registration No

AP-COM/302/2026

Registration Date

24-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Decision Date

18th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 29A

Petitioner(s)

EMTA COAL LIMITED SANDIP AGARWAL AND CO.

Respondent(s)

LARSEN AND TOURBO LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

06-05-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 29 A)

18-05-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 29 A)

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
18-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Case Summary: AP-COM/302/2026 The High Court at Calcutta granted EMTA Coal Limited's petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the sole arbitrator's mandate by eight months to conclude proceedings and publish the award in the dispute with Larsen and Tourbo Limited. The Court found no undue delay by the arbitrator and, considering the proceedings were at final arguments stage, granted the extension in the interest of justice, with both parties consenting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AP-COM/302/2026 The High Court at Calcutta granted EMTA Coal Limited's petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the sole arbitrator's mandate by eight months to conclude proceedings and publish the award in the dispute with Larsen and Tourbo Limited. The Court found no undue delay by the arbitrator and, considering the proceedings were at final arguments stage, granted the extension in the interest of justice, with both parties consenting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case