HYGIEA BIOGENICS PRIVATE LIMITED SUBHAM DEY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPO/197/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCO0014612026

Filing Number

WPO/199/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPO/197/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Police ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HYGIEA BIOGENICS PRIVATE LIMITED SUBHAM DEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Hygiea Biogenics Private Limited's writ petition seeking direction to register an FIR based on their complaint against police inaction. The court held that an alternative remedy exists under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, allowing the petitioner to approach the Jurisdictional Magistrate instead, and therefore declined to entertain the writ petition while preserving the petitioner's right to pursue the magistrate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Court Applications Under Art.226

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya

  4. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Saugata BhattacharyyaView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPO/197/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Hygiea Biogenics Private Limited's writ petition seeking direction to register an FIR based on their complaint against police inaction. The court held that an alternative remedy exists under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, allowing the petitioner to approach the Jurisdictional Magistrate instead, and therefore declined to entertain the writ petition while preserving the petitioner's right to pursue the magistrate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case