INDIA SOCIETY OF ENGINEERS POOJA SAH vs BBA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED — AP-COM/286/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11(6). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCO0014432026

e-Filing Number

20-04-2026

Filing Number

AP-COM/272/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

AP-COM/286/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11(6)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDIA SOCIETY OF ENGINEERS POOJA SAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BBA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang KanthView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Debmalya Ghoshal as sole Arbitrator to resolve disputes between India Society of Engineers and BBA Infrastructure Limited concerning an Assignment Agreement dated 05.03.2020, with both parties consenting to the appointment. The Arbitrator must furnish disclosure under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and may fix remuneration per the Fourth Schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    New Motions (Section 11)

    Hon'ble Justice Gaurang Kanth

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AP-COM/286/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Debmalya Ghoshal as sole Arbitrator to resolve disputes between India Society of Engineers and BBA Infrastructure Limited concerning an Assignment Agreement dated 05.03.2020, with both parties consenting to the appointment. The Arbitrator must furnish disclosure under Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and may fix remuneration per the Fourth Schedule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case