UCO BANK AND ANR. RAHUL SARKAR vs HDFC BANK LTD AND ORS. — CS-COM/49/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCO0013742025

e-Filing Number

10-04-2025

Filing Number

CS-COM/41/2025

Filing Date

10-Apr-2025

Registration No

CS-COM/49/2025

Registration Date

10-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UCO BANK AND ANR. RAHUL SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HDFC BANK LTD AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: In the commercial dispute between UCO Bank and HDFC Bank Ltd before the Calcutta High Court, the court directed the plaintiff to remove procedural defects identified in the Master's report dated April 2, 2026, subject to departmental approval. The plaintiff was permitted to file an amendment application if the defects were major. The matter was adjourned and directed to go out of the list temporarily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    To Be Mentioned

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

  4. 12-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF

  5. 12-Aug-2025

    Presentation Of Plaint

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao

  6. 08-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF

  7. 08-Aug-2025

    To Be Mentioned

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna Rao

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF

  9. 12-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Krishna RaoView PDF

  10. 21-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS-COM/49/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In the commercial dispute between UCO Bank and HDFC Bank Ltd before the Calcutta High Court, the court directed the plaintiff to remove procedural defects identified in the Master's report dated April 2, 2026, subject to departmental approval. The plaintiff was permitted to file an amendment application if the defects were major. The matter was adjourned and directed to go out of the list temporarily. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case