PRANOB KUMAR GHOSH ZAINAB TAHUR vs M/S. S.A. ENTERPRISE AND ORS — AP/64/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0013542026
Filing Number
AP/61/2026
Filing Date
10-04-2026
Registration No
AP/64/2026
Registration Date
10-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRANOB KUMAR GHOSH ZAINAB TAHUR
Respondent(s)
M/S. S.A. ENTERPRISE AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)
NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)
NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11) |
| 05-05-2026 | NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11) |
| 28-04-2026 | NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11) |
Orders
Case Summary: AP/64/2026 The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Ishaan Saha, Advocate, as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between Pranob Kumar Ghosh and M/S. S.A. Enterprise arising from a development agreement dated 02.11.2019 concerning land in North 24-Parganas. Both parties mutually agreed to the appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, after the respondent failed to participate in arbitration following the petitioner's notice dated 20.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: AP/64/2026 The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Ishaan Saha, Advocate, as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes between Pranob Kumar Ghosh and M/S. S.A. Enterprise arising from a development agreement dated 02.11.2019 concerning land in North 24-Parganas. Both parties mutually agreed to the appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, after the respondent failed to participate in arbitration following the petitioner's notice dated 20.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts