M/S IZUK CHEMICAL WORKS (ORA/103/2006/TM/KOL) TANMAY ROY vs SHRI USMAN GANI ANSARI AND SUKURULLA ANSARI TRADING AS MD SAKURULLA AND SONS — IPDATM /46/2023
Case under Trade Marks Act ,1999 Section 47/57/125. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0013442023
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
Filing Number
IPDATM /46/2023
Filing Date
06-03-2023
Registration No
IPDATM /46/2023
Registration Date
06-03-2023
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S IZUK CHEMICAL WORKS (ORA/103/2006/TM/KOL) TANMAY ROY
Respondent(s)
SHRI USMAN GANI ANSARI AND SUKURULLA ANSARI TRADING AS MD SAKURULLA AND SONS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE
MATTERS UNDER THE PATENT AND DESIGNS ACT
MATTERS UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT
MATTERS UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT
MATTERS UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT
MATTERS UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2023 | MATTERS UNDER THE PATENT AND DESIGNS ACT | |
| 04-05-2026 | MATTERS UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT | |
| 25-03-2026 | MATTERS UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT | |
| 10-03-2026 | MATTERS UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT | |
| 02-03-2026 | MATTERS UNDER THE TRADE MARKS ACT |
Orders
Summary: The High Court at Calcutta's Intellectual Property Rights Division adjourned the trademark dispute between M/S Izuk Chemical Works and Shri Usman Gani Ansari et al. to the May 2026 monthly list. The Court noted a likelihood of amicable resolution and directed both parties to attempt settling their disputes, with liberty to seek early hearing if substantial progress is made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court at Calcutta's Intellectual Property Rights Division adjourned the trademark dispute between M/S Izuk Chemical Works and Shri Usman Gani Ansari et al. to the May 2026 monthly list. The Court noted a likelihood of amicable resolution and directed both parties to attempt settling their disputes, with liberty to seek early hearing if substantial progress is made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts