M/S. TIMBCON ADRISNATA CHAKRABORTY vs SYAMA PRASAD MOOKHERJEE PORT, KOLKATA AND ORS. — AP-COM/267/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0013272026
e-Filing Number
09-04-2026
Filing Number
AP-COM/255/2026
Filing Date
09-04-2026
Registration No
AP-COM/267/2026
Registration Date
09-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. TIMBCON ADRISNATA CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
SYAMA PRASAD MOOKHERJEE PORT, KOLKATA AND ORS.
The Chairman, Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port Trust
The Chief Engineer, Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port
The Superintending Engineer, Syama Prasad Mookerjee Port
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH
NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)
NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)
NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)
NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11) |
| 08-05-2026 | NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11) |
| 27-04-2026 | NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11) |
| 20-04-2026 | NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11) |
Orders
Case Summary: AP-COM/267/2026 The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Arik Banerjee as Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve disputes between TIMBCON and Syama Prasad Mookherjee Port over unpaid contractual dues for office renovation work. The court rejected the respondent's premature objection claim, holding that since the Chairman failed to respond to the petitioner's appeal within the stipulated period, the petitioner was entitled to invoke arbitration and that administrative silence cannot indefinitely bar legitimate contractual claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: AP-COM/267/2026 The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Arik Banerjee as Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve disputes between TIMBCON and Syama Prasad Mookherjee Port over unpaid contractual dues for office renovation work. The court rejected the respondent's premature objection claim, holding that since the Chairman failed to respond to the petitioner's appeal within the stipulated period, the petitioner was entitled to invoke arbitration and that administrative silence cannot indefinitely bar legitimate contractual claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts