DR. SENJUTI CHOWDHURY VICTOR CHATTERJEE vs KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. — WPO/180/2026
Case under Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act ,1980 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCO0013252026
Filing Number
WPO/182/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPO/180/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Municipality ( 17 )
Judicial Branch
CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 16-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. SENJUTI CHOWDHURY VICTOR CHATTERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
The Calcutta High Court dismissed Dr. Senjuti Chowdhury's writ petition challenging a KMC job advertisement, holding that she was six months over the age limit and that her 3.5 years of contractual service under the National Urban Health Mission did not constitute substantial service warranting regularization. The Court granted limited relief by directing KMC to consider her representation dated 28th March 2026 in accordance with law, without quashing the advertisement or allowing her to participate in the selection process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Court Applications Under Art.226
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPO/180/2026
The Calcutta High Court dismissed Dr. Senjuti Chowdhury's writ petition challenging a KMC job advertisement, holding that she was six months over the age limit and that her 3.5 years of contractual service under the National Urban Health Mission did not constitute substantial service warranting regularization. The Court granted limited relief by directing KMC to consider her representation dated 28th March 2026 in accordance with law, without quashing the advertisement or allowing her to participate in the selection process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts