JAGRATI TRADE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER SURANA AND CHOUDHURY vs TIRUPATI VINCOM PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS — APOT/60/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCO0012462026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2026

Filing Number

APOT/61/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

APOT/60/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGRATI TRADE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER SURANA AND CHOUDHURY

  2. 2.JAGDISH SARDA

    Adv. AASISH CHOUDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TIRUPATI VINCOM PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS

  2. 2.James Glendye and Co Private Limited

  3. 3.Orbit Towers Private Limited

  4. 4.Dileep Singh Mehta

  5. 5.Damani Infracon Private Limited

  6. 6.Prakash Damani

  7. 7.Deepak Bhargava

  8. 8.Rajni Bhargava

  9. 9.Vaibhav Bhargava

  10. 10.Gayatri Bhargava

  11. 11.Monisha Bhargava

  12. 12.Smriti Raina

  13. 13.Megha Saigal

  14. 14.The Calcutta Phototype Company Limited

  15. 15.CSP Investment and Financial Services Private Limited

  16. 16.Shurya Packaging Private Limited

  17. 17.Box and Carlton Private limited

  18. 18.Aristo Texcon Private Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Biswaroop ChowdhuryView PDF

  3. 13-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Biswaroop ChowdhuryView PDF

    The Calcutta High Court dismissed the appellant's Section 8 application (Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996) to refer a share dispute to arbitration, holding that the interlinked causes of action against multiple defendants—including non-signatories to the arbitration agreement—cannot be bifurcated. The court confirmed that since serious fraud allegations connected all defendants in a single transaction and relief was sought jointly against all, the entire suit must remain in civil court rather than being partially arbitrated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-May-2026

    Specially Assigned Matters

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury

  5. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak,hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar RashidiView PDF

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APOT/60/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court dismissed the appellant's Section 8 application (Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996) to refer a share dispute to arbitration, holding that the interlinked causes of action against multiple defendants—including non-signatories to the arbitration agreement—cannot be bifurcated. The court confirmed that since serious fraud allegations connected all defendants in a single transaction and relief was sought jointly against all, the entire suit must remain in civil court rather than being partially arbitrated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case