T. E. THOMSON AND COMPANY LIMITED DWIPRAJ BASU vs MUSICAL FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED — CS-COM /33/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCO0010272026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
CS-COM /26/2026
Filing Date
19-03-2026
Registration No
CS-COM /33/2026
Registration Date
19-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T. E. THOMSON AND COMPANY LIMITED DWIPRAJ BASU
Respondent(s)
MUSICAL FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY
PRESENTATION OF PLAINT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | PRESENTATION OF PLAINT |
Orders
Case Summary: The High Court at Calcutta's Commercial Division struck off the plaintiff's prayer for dispensation of pre-litigation mediation in this eviction suit (CS-COM/33/2026) between T.E. Thomson and Company Limited v. Musical Films Private Limited. The court found no scope for such dispensation since the suit, originally filed in 2018 in the Non-commercial Division, had already been transferred to the Commercial Division under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The department was directed to scrutinize the plaint for deficiencies, and the plaintiff was permitted to correct any such deficiencies in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The High Court at Calcutta's Commercial Division struck off the plaintiff's prayer for dispensation of pre-litigation mediation in this eviction suit (CS-COM/33/2026) between T.E. Thomson and Company Limited v. Musical Films Private Limited. The court found no scope for such dispensation since the suit, originally filed in 2018 in the Non-commercial Division, had already been transferred to the Commercial Division under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The department was directed to scrutinize the plaint for deficiencies, and the plaintiff was permitted to correct any such deficiencies in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts