CHHAYA PRAKASHANI LIMITED FARHAN GHAFFAR vs NEW LEKHAPARA — CS-COM /31/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0009872026

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

CS-COM /23/2026

Filing Date

17-03-2026

Registration No

CS-COM /31/2026

Registration Date

17-03-2026

Judge

THE LEARNED MASTER & OFFICIAL REFEREE

Coram

THE LEARNED MASTER & OFFICIAL REFEREE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

CHHAYA PRAKASHANI LIMITED FARHAN GHAFFAR

Respondent(s)

NEW LEKHAPARA

Hearing History

Judge: THE LEARNED MASTER & OFFICIAL REFEREE

20-03-2026

PRESENTATION OF PLAINT

27-03-2026

PRESENTATION OF PLAINT

23-03-2026

PRESENTATION OF PLAINT

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

The Calcutta High Court dismissed the plaintiff's baseless prayers for leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865 and Order II, Rule 2 of CPC, finding them irrelevant and unsupported by proper averments. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the plaintiff, payable to the Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee within one week, and permitted the plaintiff to present the plaint before the learned master only upon production of payment evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court dismissed the plaintiff's baseless prayers for leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865 and Order II, Rule 2 of CPC, finding them irrelevant and unsupported by proper averments. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the plaintiff, payable to the Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee within one week, and permitted the plaintiff to present the plaint before the learned master only upon production of payment evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case