CHHAYA PRAKASHANI LIMITED FARHAN GHAFFAR vs NEW LEKHAPARA — CS-COM/31/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Next hearing 27-Mar-2026

CNR: WBCHCO0009872026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

CS-COM/23/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CS-COM/31/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

The Learned Master & Official Referee

Coram

The Learned Master & Official Referee

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHHAYA PRAKASHANI LIMITED FARHAN GHAFFAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NEW LEKHAPARA

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Presentation Of Plaint

    The Learned Master & Official Referee

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha RoyView PDF

    The Calcutta High Court dismissed the plaintiff's baseless prayers for leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865 and Order II, Rule 2 of CPC, finding them irrelevant and unsupported by proper averments. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the plaintiff, payable to the Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee within one week, and permitted the plaintiff to present the plaint before the learned master only upon production of payment evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Presentation Of Plaint

    Hon'ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS-COM/31/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court dismissed the plaintiff's baseless prayers for leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, 1865 and Order II, Rule 2 of CPC, finding them irrelevant and unsupported by proper averments. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the plaintiff, payable to the Calcutta High Court Legal Services Committee within one week, and permitted the plaintiff to present the plaint before the learned master only upon production of payment evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case