NAND LAL RATHI SUMIT BISWAS vs M/S. A. T. GOOYEE ENTERPRISES AND ORS. — APDT/6/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCO0009302026

Filing Number

APDT/6/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

APDT/6/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAND LAL RATHI SUMIT BISWAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. A. T. GOOYEE ENTERPRISES AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appellant Nand Lal Rathi's appeal (APDT/6/2026) challenging the Single Judge's refusal to grant permanent injunction, despite declaring his tenancy rights. The court held that since an earlier appeal (APDT/4/2026) upholding the eviction decree against the appellant was dismissed, the present appeal fails as it depended on the outcome of the prior matter, leaving no scope for granting injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Arijit Banerjee,hon'ble Justice Apurba Sinha RayView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    New Applications

    Hon'ble Justice Rajasekhar Mantha , Hon'ble Justice Rai Chattopadhyay

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APDT/6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appellant Nand Lal Rathi's appeal (APDT/6/2026) challenging the Single Judge's refusal to grant permanent injunction, despite declaring his tenancy rights. The court held that since an earlier appeal (APDT/4/2026) upholding the eviction decree against the appellant was dismissed, the present appeal fails as it depended on the outcome of the prior matter, leaving no scope for granting injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case