NAND LAL RATHI SUMIT BISWAS vs M/S. A. T. GOOYEE ENTERPRISES AND ORS. — APDT /6/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0009302026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

APDT /6/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

APDT /6/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

NAND LAL RATHI SUMIT BISWAS

Respondent(s)

M/S. A. T. GOOYEE ENTERPRISES AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

23-03-2026

NEW APPLICATIONS

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appellant Nand Lal Rathi's appeal (APDT/6/2026) challenging the Single Judge's refusal to grant permanent injunction, despite declaring his tenancy rights. The court held that since an earlier appeal (APDT/4/2026) upholding the eviction decree against the appellant was dismissed, the present appeal fails as it depended on the outcome of the prior matter, leaving no scope for granting injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the appellant Nand Lal Rathi's appeal (APDT/6/2026) challenging the Single Judge's refusal to grant permanent injunction, despite declaring his tenancy rights. The court held that since an earlier appeal (APDT/4/2026) upholding the eviction decree against the appellant was dismissed, the present appeal fails as it depended on the outcome of the prior matter, leaving no scope for granting injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case