SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTD ABHRATANU SARKAR vs SANCHITA CHOWDHURY AND ANOTHER — AP-COM/182/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11(6). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0008342026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

AP-COM /172/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

AP-COM /182/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11(6)

Petitioner(s)

SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTD ABHRATANU SARKAR

Respondent(s)

SANCHITA CHOWDHURY AND ANOTHER

Dipankar Chowdhury

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

30-03-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)

06-04-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)

01-04-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)

31-03-2026

NEW MOTIONS (SECTION 11)

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH

The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Sk Sariful Haque as Sole Arbitrator to resolve disputes between Shriram Finance Limited and Sanchita Chowdhury regarding loan defaults on a Rs. 9,85,000 vehicle financing agreement. The court found a valid arbitration clause existed and disputes had arisen, satisfying the requirements under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, warranting referral to arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Sk Sariful Haque as Sole Arbitrator to resolve disputes between Shriram Finance Limited and Sanchita Chowdhury regarding loan defaults on a Rs. 9,85,000 vehicle financing agreement. The court found a valid arbitration clause existed and disputes had arisen, satisfying the requirements under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, warranting referral to arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case