SAHIDA BEGAM @ BEGUM @ KHATOON AND ANR AMAL KUMAR DUTTA vs SHRI SATISH JHA THE CMD ECL AND ORS — CC/18/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act ,1971 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCO0007622026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CC /18/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

CC /18/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

CURRENT RECORD DEPARTMENT

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act ,1971 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SAHIDA BEGAM @ BEGUM @ KHATOON AND ANR AMAL KUMAR DUTTA

Respondent(s)

SHRI SATISH JHA THE CMD ECL AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

13-03-2026

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

10-04-2026

CONTEMPT MATTERS

27-03-2026

CONTEMPT MATTERS

20-03-2026

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

The Calcutta High Court dismissed a contempt of court proceeding (CC/18/2026) filed by Sahida Begam against Shri Satish Jha (CMD ECL) and others, finding that the petitioner was unwilling to proceed as she failed to appear despite multiple hearings. Justice Aniruddha Roy closed the case, observing that the petitioner's repeated non-appearance demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the contempt matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court dismissed a contempt of court proceeding (CC/18/2026) filed by Sahida Begam against Shri Satish Jha (CMD ECL) and others, finding that the petitioner was unwilling to proceed as she failed to appear despite multiple hearings. Justice Aniruddha Roy closed the case, observing that the petitioner's repeated non-appearance demonstrated lack of interest in pursuing the contempt matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case