NAND LAL RATHI SUMIT BISWAS vs M/S. A.T. GOOYEE ENTERPRISES — APDT/4/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: WBCHCO0006802026

Filing Number

APDT/4/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

APDT/4/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAND LAL RATHI SUMIT BISWAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. A.T. GOOYEE ENTERPRISES

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the tenant Nand Lal Rathi's appeal, affirming the trial court's judgment that he was a tenant under a valid lease deed dated April 1, 2004, and upholding the landlord's eviction decree. The court rejected the appellant's contentions that the lease deed was abandoned in favor of a monthly tenancy and that the lessor's identity was unclear due to name variations (Goyee vs. Gooyee), finding sufficient evidence that both parties treated these names interchangeably and acted upon the original lease agreement. The court further held that even if a monthly tenancy existed, it was validly terminated by a quit notice complying with Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Arijit Banerjee,hon'ble Justice Apurba Sinha RayView PDF

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Appeals From Decree

    Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak , Hon'ble Justice MD. Shabbar Rashidi

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APDT/4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed the tenant Nand Lal Rathi's appeal, affirming the trial court's judgment that he was a tenant under a valid lease deed dated April 1, 2004, and upholding the landlord's eviction decree. The court rejected the appellant's contentions that the lease deed was abandoned in favor of a monthly tenancy and that the lessor's identity was unclear due to name variations (Goyee vs. Gooyee), finding sufficient evidence that both parties treated these names interchangeably and acted upon the original lease agreement. The court further held that even if a monthly tenancy existed, it was validly terminated by a quit notice complying with Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case