PRAVIN UTTAM JADHAV vs M/S SENCO JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED — CS-COM /12/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA. Next hearing: 17th November 2025.

CNR: WBCHCO0002532025

Next Hearing

17th November 2025

e-Filing Number

17-01-2025

Filing Number

CS-COM /9/2025

Filing Date

22-01-2025

Registration No

CS-COM /12/2025

Registration Date

22-01-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

Judicial Branch

WRIT AND EXECUTION DEPT(INCL. CHAMBER CLERK)

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PRAVIN UTTAM JADHAV

Adv. SUNIL KUMAR SINGHANIA

Respondent(s)

M/S SENCO JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

28-01-2025

PRESENTATION OF PLAINT

17-11-2025

ADJOURNED MOTION

25-09-2025

ADJOURNED MOTION

24-09-2025

ADJOURNED MOTION

23-09-2025

ADJOURNED MOTION

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY

Summary: The High Court at Calcutta rejected the plaintiff's application for summary judgment against M/S Senco Jewellers Private Limited for Rs. 49,50,300/- (involving disputed GST credit claims), finding the dispute to be an accounting matter requiring resolution. The court ordered mandatory mediation to commence within two weeks and conclude within two months, with parties given seven days to negotiate a settlement; if mediation fails, the summary judgment application will be taken up for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court at Calcutta rejected the plaintiff's application for summary judgment against M/S Senco Jewellers Private Limited for Rs. 49,50,300/- (involving disputed GST credit claims), finding the dispute to be an accounting matter requiring resolution. The court ordered mandatory mediation to commence within two weeks and conclude within two months, with parties given seven days to negotiate a settlement; if mediation fails, the summary judgment application will be taken up for hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case