SIRAJUL HAQUE @ SERAJUL HAQUE AND ANR MOUSUMI DAS vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A) /1002/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th January 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0064442025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

23rd December 2025

Filing Number

CRM(A) /995/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

CRM(A) /1002/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

07th January 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act ,1985 Section 20BIIC,25/29

Petitioner(s)

SIRAJUL HAQUE @ SERAJUL HAQUE AND ANR MOUSUMI DAS

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

23-12-2025

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

25-03-2026

MODIFICATION/RELAXATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL

24-03-2026

MODIFICATION/RELAXATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL

18-03-2026

MODIFICATION/RELAXATION OF ANTICIPATORY BAIL

07-01-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

Orders

06-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri rejected the petitioner Sirajul Haque's application for modification of the bail order. The court directed the petitioner to comply with existing bail conditions and meet the investigating officer weekly, while granting liberty to file a regular bail application in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri rejected the petitioner Sirajul Haque's application for modification of the bail order. The court directed the petitioner to comply with existing bail conditions and meet the investigating officer weekly, while granting liberty to file a regular bail application in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case