SONAM SAH @ SONAM SHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/668/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0064352025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

23rd December 2025

Filing Number

CRM(NDPS) /661/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

CRM(NDPS) /668/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

SONAM SAH @ SONAM SHA

Adv. Hillol Saha Podder

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

23-12-2025

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

25-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

19-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

18-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

17-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri rejected the post-arrest bail application of Sonam Sah under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in an NDPS case involving brown sugar seizure. The court found that since a commercial quantity of brown sugar was seized from the petitioner's joint possession, the petitioner could not overcome the bail restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985, and accordingly dismissed the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri rejected the post-arrest bail application of Sonam Sah under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in an NDPS case involving brown sugar seizure. The court found that since a commercial quantity of brown sugar was seized from the petitioner's joint possession, the petitioner could not overcome the bail restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985, and accordingly dismissed the bail petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case