CHAMPA ROY BARMAN SUBINAY DEY vs ARINDAM BISWAS — CPAN/98/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act ,1971 Section NA. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0063062025

Next Hearing

08th May 2026

Filing Number

CPAN /99/2025

Filing Date

18-12-2025

Registration No

CPAN /98/2025

Registration Date

18-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Civil Contempt ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

FIRST APPEAL (F.A.) SECTION

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act ,1971 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

CHAMPA ROY BARMAN SUBINAY DEY

Respondent(s)

ARINDAM BISWAS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

23-12-2025

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

08-05-2026

CONTEMPT APPLICATION

Orders

10-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY

The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) heard a contempt application (CPAN 98 of 2025) by Champa Roy Barman regarding non-compliance with an August 12, 2025 order. The court found the original order was properly served on the Special Land Acquisition Collector, Cooch Behar, and directed the petitioner to serve the contempt application on the alleged contemnor and file an affidavit of service. The matter is adjourned and listed before the Principal Bench on May 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) heard a contempt application (CPAN 98 of 2025) by Champa Roy Barman regarding non-compliance with an August 12, 2025 order. The court found the original order was properly served on the Special Land Acquisition Collector, Cooch Behar, and directed the petitioner to serve the contempt application on the alleged contemnor and file an affidavit of service. The matter is adjourned and listed before the Principal Bench on May 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case