RAJAT MAJID@ CHHOTU PRITAM ROY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/576/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0060572025
Next Hearing
17th December 2025
Filing Number
CRM(NDPS) /569/2025
Filing Date
15-12-2025
Registration No
CRM(NDPS) /576/2025
Registration Date
15-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJAT MAJID@ CHHOTU PRITAM ROY
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-12-2025 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 25-03-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 16-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 13-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL | |
| 12-02-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
Orders
Summary: The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) rejected Rajat Majid's bail application in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity narcotics seized near the India-Bhutan border. The court held that procedural deficiencies in the search and seizure (absence of independent witness) were not fatal to prosecution, and given the offense's gravity and the petitioner's complicity, he could not overcome Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) rejected Rajat Majid's bail application in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity narcotics seized near the India-Bhutan border. The court held that procedural deficiencies in the search and seizure (absence of independent witness) were not fatal to prosecution, and given the offense's gravity and the petitioner's complicity, he could not overcome Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts