MAHEDI @ MEHEDI HASAN AVIPSHA DUTTA ROY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRA(DB) /63/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Act ,1974 Section 454. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0060402023

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

04th December 2023

Filing Number

CRA(DB) /64/2023

Filing Date

16-11-2023

Registration No

CRA(DB) /63/2023

Registration Date

16-11-2023

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Convition: Sentence/imprisonment/imprisonment & fine/probation/admonition ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Act ,1974 Section 454

Petitioner(s)

MAHEDI @ MEHEDI HASAN AVIPSHA DUTTA ROY

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

04-12-2023

FOR ADMISSION

25-03-2026

APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL

23-03-2026

APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL

18-03-2026

APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL

17-03-2026

APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK,HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

The High Court at Calcutta set aside the trial court's vehicle confiscation order in an NDPS case where all accused were acquitted. Since the vehicle owner was not implicated in the case and no useful purpose would be served by confiscation, the court ordered authorities to release the vehicle to the appellant upon furnishing appropriate indemnity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta set aside the trial court's vehicle confiscation order in an NDPS case where all accused were acquitted. Since the vehicle owner was not implicated in the case and no useful purpose would be served by confiscation, the court ordered authorities to release the vehicle to the appellant upon furnishing appropriate indemnity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case