DIWASH CHHETRI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/551/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0059562025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th December 2025

Filing Number

CRM(NDPS) /544/2025

Filing Date

10-12-2025

Registration No

CRM(NDPS) /551/2025

Registration Date

10-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

DIWASH CHHETRI

Adv. DEBAJIT KUNDU

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

18-12-2025

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

25-03-2026

Revoked

19-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

18-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

23-12-2025

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

The Calcutta High Court rejected Diwash Chhetri's bail application in an NDPS case, holding that his conscious possession of commercial quantity contraband seized from a scooter cannot be discounted and he failed to overcome Section 37 restrictions of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court dismissed his argument regarding missing FSL reports, ruling that absence of such reports is not fatal to prosecution and initial testing had confirmed the substance's nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court rejected Diwash Chhetri's bail application in an NDPS case, holding that his conscious possession of commercial quantity contraband seized from a scooter cannot be discounted and he failed to overcome Section 37 restrictions of the NDPS Act, 1985. The court dismissed his argument regarding missing FSL reports, ruling that absence of such reports is not fatal to prosecution and initial testing had confirmed the substance's nature. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case